And sometimes it works.
A review can be an exercise in formula. It can borrow structure from other reviewers. It can use general categories of comment - how did the food taste? could you hear what the lead singer was saying? did the set design support the director's vision? - as a guide through the experience, suggesting things you should pay attention to.
When it comes to reviewing, we do not have to reinvent the wheel. We can use existing reviews as models. We can, of course, ignore models and come at the review stupendously, outrageously, in some quirky personal way your teacher has never imagined.
But sometimes we paint by the numbers in the sense of using an existing framework to contain your own fresh insights.
By the way, the Smithsonian Institute did an exhibit on paint by the numbers called Every Man a Rembrandt, concentrating on how this particular corner of the consumer market said something profound about American culture, and not necessarily a negative thing.
When in doubt about what to put in a review, answer the questions: What does the object of this review say about American culture? What does my reaction to it say about me? Those questions will allow you to paint outside the lines.
This is the blog of the Arts Reviewing and Reporting Class Spring 2018 at the University of San Francisco. As Oscar Wilde wrote, “To the critic, the work of art is simply a suggestion for a new work of his own.”
Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Review
Our Class Blogs
Friday, August 8, 2014
Reviewing Using a Checklist? Call it Cookie Cutter. Call it Paint by the Numbers.
Labels:
paint by numbers,
reviewing tips,
Smithsonian
J. Michael Robertson directs the journalism program in the Department of Media Studies at the University of San Francisco. He was an editor/staff writer at the San Francisco Chronicle, 1980-1991, and Atlanta Magazine, 1976-1980. He received a Ph.D. in English Literature from Duke University in 1972.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Building Vocabulary
Reviewing Books
Reviewing Drama
Reviewing the Fine Arts
Reviewing Restaurants
A More Academic Approach
Big Critics
Reviewing Music
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(58)
-
▼
August
(20)
- Ian Port, Late of the SF Weekly, Sums Up the Local...
- My 'Smart' Restaurant Review
- Irony is a Useful Tool. Here a Cartoonist Explains...
- Snark: I Sneer, Therefore I Am
- Checklist for the Restaurant Review
- The 50 dorkiest songs you secretly love
- Last Year's 19 Most Scathing Restaurant Reviews
- The Bechdel Test: or Why Old Actors Get the Girl a...
- It's Gold Coins That Keep People Reading, Not Gold...
- A Meal Can Have a Purpose
- When You Write Your Leads, Think of Me and Remembe...
- An Actual Arts Journalism Job
- In Reviewing, the Problem of Shared Vocabulary, of...
- Simpsons 'Greatest Show in TV History' - FXX Runs ...
- How Netflix is Turning Us into Puppets
- Shared Taste in Music Predicts Sexual Attraction
- Those Things in My Ears
- Why "Gravity Falls"?
- Fasthion website removes post amid plagiarism charge
- Reviewing Using a Checklist? Call it Cookie Cutter...
-
▼
August
(20)
No comments:
Post a Comment